The reading passage suggests that R. robustus was a scavenger. However, the professor contends that it a hunter.
The lecturer opposes with the author of the text regarding the idea that the ancient mammal R. robust was an active hunter. The professor suggests that the mass, speed and lack of teeth marks on the eaten animals are not sufficient evidence for claiming that the mammal was a scavenger, as it was proposed in the text.
Firstly, the lecturer states that the mass of R. robust was twice bigger than of his prey, what exactly matches with the minimum parameters, namely 2:1, to hunt other animal. For this reason, the professor concludes that the mammal was enough big to hunt on a baby dinosaur.
As the second evidence the professor provides an example of a Tasmanian devil whose legs are sited in the same way as once R. robust has. She explains that regardless of legs’ position the Tasmanian devil can move at a high speed therefore the mammal was able to hunt its prey.
Finally, she mentioned that R. robust has strong back teeth. Thus, although there were no marks of the teeth on the dinosaur in its stomach, it does not mean that the mammal at a dinosaur’s egg. Owing to its teeth animal could swallow entirely its prey or in big pieces.
To recapitulate, the professor contend that the hypothesis provided by the scientists in the text was plausible while the position of the author was fallacious. R. robust highly likely was an active hunter and did not eat dinosaurs’ eggs.
- The diagram illustrates the process of making tea in conventional and modern methods 84
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture In general and for the futur 76
- The maps show the development of the seaside resort of Templeton over the span of 15 years from 1990 to 2005 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 60
- The diagram details the process by which pots made from ceramics are manufactured 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...low entirely its prey or in big pieces. To recapitulate, the professor contend t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7387755102 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45660716922 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54693877551 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1998329154 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9285714286 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172073299191 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570233903135 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682912553318 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10592587012 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078755932107 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.