Some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
How to handle criminals is a problem that all countries and society face. However, whether government should punish crimes by placing them in jail for a long time to pay for what they have done or not is a controversial issue. I am of the opinion that trying to make them better with training and education maybe a good approach than we lock them in prison.
There are several significant benefits associated with criminal education. First of all, it is obvious that many people have a tendency to end up their life time in the prison because they did not have a good education and a happy family. If crimes are taught a job-related knowledge which will enable them to become skilled employees in the future, most of them, after liberty, can enter the workplace, earn a living and support their families. Therefore, the return crime rate will reduce.
Moreover, consider all the money that the government spent to lock people up in jail. It does not seem like a good use of the budget because most criminals eventually will let out of the prison, we should give top priority to make them better citizens and spend that money on welfare system such as a hospital or education establishment.
This is not to say, however, that we should neglect the positive impact of a jail. There are, of course, some people commit serious crimes like mass murder or violate other people need to be given in the prison during the rest of their life. But still, education has a crucial role in making criminals become useful for society.
In conclusion, the major function of the prisons should be providing most crimes with disciplines that relate to their future life. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the important roles criminals are undertaking. Only by doing so, we can ensure that they will have a good life after having freedom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-16 | trungtrung | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | trungtrung | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-23 | Tran Ly | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | Alice Phan | 56 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | Alice Phan | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period. 67
- The chart below show the changes in car ownership in UK between 1961 and 2001 67
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- line chart 11
- Line 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... people have a tendency to end up their life time in the prison because they did not have...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77917981073 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49894045555 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2925150651 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195434566708 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665260403741 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443758095335 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115583430704 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437795334319 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.