Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted on the media Do you agree or disagree with this statement Your essay should be about 250 words

Nowadays, representations of crimes are comprehensively reflected in the media, and suggested to be curbed due to their potential negative effects on society. As far as I am concerned, spread of such descriptions should not be prevented.

First and foremost, although some of criminal behaviours are considered to be quite brutal to broadcast to people, they bear informative characteristics of offenders. That is because, providing exact procedure and outcomes of offences will help people to gain insight into mindset of criminals. In this case, robbery should be taken as an example. It is undeniable that burglars usually exploit the weak point of the place where they want to commit robbery. Thus, by reading news, individuals will be more cognizant of how safe their possessions are, and take needed action to prevent possible burglary that may happen to them. Thus, illegal actions delineated in broadcast can open the eyes of people.

On the other hand, the fact that every member of society from children to adults receive criminal news should not be neglected. In other words, sensitive contents may adversely influence some individuals, especially children. Thus, this may end up psychological breakdown of youngsters by creating tendency toward violence. Furthermore, the conviction rate, in future, will start to increase, as more people will commit offences. However, media always puts censor for such contents in order to eliminate easy access.

To conclude, people suggests to control broadcasts that provide criminal news thoroughly, since they are more likely to give a rise to unforeseen results. However, as the censorship exists, they can confidently be shared to make them more informed.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested being'.
Suggestion: suggested being
...rehensively reflected in the media, and suggested to be curbed due to their potential negative ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ence. Furthermore, the conviction rate, in future, will start to increase, as more people...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, so, thus, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4606741573 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97033262439 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659176029963 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8620137112 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200794412588 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644538488307 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581252586081 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116898479589 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334407008428 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.