The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The provided 2 charts give an insight into the number of people owning electrical household devices and the number of hours weekly they spend to do household chores such as washing clothes, and cooking meals, respectively, during the period from 1920 to 2019.
In overall, it can be observed from both of the graphs that there has been a reverse correlation between the time spent on the 3 activities and the number of owners having appliances replacing those corresponding housework. In other words, each year the use of appliances in homes were becoming more likely situation and people were gradually giving up doing the chores manually.
Regarding the trends of the utilizing 3 apparatus mentioned in the first graph, at the start of 1920, the situation was such that as if almost nobody were informed of the existence of refrigerators. However, washing machines and vacuum cleaner were being utilized by 30 and 40 percent of the houses respectively. Intriguingly, the number of homes with washing machines started booming with a sudden jump from nearly 0 to almost 55 percent, whereas the rise in the other appliances had relatively moderate slope.
Meanwhile, the time that people spend on manual activities followed a linear downfall from 50 to 35 hours per week, and continued the trend plunging in 20% during the next 2 decades when the refrigerators sustain their dominance over other appliances. Speaking in general, until 2019, fridges continued growth till reaching a plateau of 100 percentage, whereas washing machines were fluctuating and eventually ending up 75%. Finally, it was observed that usage of vacuum cleaners were linearly growing, and it also reached plateau of 100 percent during last 19 years.
- The process below describes the chewing gum production. 56
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The diagram shows how chewing gum is made 82
- Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government should pay for some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in general, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18571428571 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7647563276 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 106.607317073 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5246516363 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.333333333 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137544334862 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516975844219 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575814983455 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908284734493 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632652956178 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.