Many people argue that the public can be negatively affected by detrimental information from detailed descriptions of crime scenes in printed newspapers and on television; therefore, this should be limited in the media. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts, people’s anxiety and damage to our economy.
The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported cursory is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. Young people or even children nowadays use the internet as their main method of collecting information. Everyday in social media, more and more articles relating to killings, robberies or kidnaping appear, which will raise curiosity and impulse them to act the same.
Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. Detailed descriptions of crime scenes may lead to excessive panic and anxiety for people especially those with weak mentality. They may become anti-society, unwilling to connect with others. They are always fear of being the victim of a potential crime.As a result, it could lead to not only a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need but also a burden for the government.
Last but not least, detailed descriptions of crime scenes may not be highly appreciated by other people or foreign media outlets. A newspaper that has a strong connection with cases like killings, robberies or kidnappings will be the cause of adverse effects on both tourism and the economy. Tourists feel fear of visiting this country for fear of being victimized in these crimes and many foreign companies will hesitate in investing into the country with such a chaotic society.
In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports on newspapers and television due to its negative impact on the public. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned and Journalists or television directors should make a wise choice when publishing the news in order to create a better society, repel crimes and unite people.
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent d 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 83
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...f being the victim of a potential crime.As a result, it could lead to not only a l...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e country with such a chaotic society. In conclusion, I strongly oppose the ide...
^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the crimes should be completely banned and Journalists or television directors ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16761363636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80762174502 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2839505837 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293348984543 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105499977726 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895886917017 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173932839678 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081263145274 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.