Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People hold different views on the measures to assist poor nations. While some people believe that assistance in terms of non-financial such as practical aids and advices are more beneficial, I am of the opinion that financial support is an effective and efficient solution to help less developed countries
On the one hand, there are reasons to believe that practical aids and advices are what developing countries need. First, an effective education system is one of the key factors that determine the prosperity of a country on how to build such a system is critical. For example, since the Vietnamese school curriculum focuses heavily on theories and ignore the practicality, students fail to apply what they learn to come up with creative solution to real world problems, which has led to the impedance of the country’s economic and technological progress. At this stage, consultancy from developed countries is needed to improve Vietnam education system. Secondly, foreign assistance can also be in the form of providing human resources. By having a sufficient amount of expertise and professional work in various fields, hopefully less develop countries can lift themselves out of economic difficulties and head towards a sustainable development.
On the other hand, I believe the financial assistance would be more vital to developing countries. The initiatives of education reform would appear to be infeasible if a country is financially disadvantaged. In the aforementioned example regarding Vietnam, while the idea of reforming the education system seems promising in the long-term, it cannot be executed in the short-term due to various costs associated, such as purchasing learning tools, training and paying teachers. Furthermore, with the external monetary flow, poor nations can invest in medical and scientific researches. Should a sufficient money is spent on those crucial areas, technological advancements are likely to be made and such innovations would bring about economic growth of a nation.
In conclusion, while some people argue that foreign practical assistance is more useful for third world countries, I strongly believe that support in form of finance serves as a better solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-03 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
| 2017-04-04 | sandrock | 84 | view |
- Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports. 72
- Master of Engineering, Civil Engineering 80
- Climate change Is a phenomenon that affects countries all over the world Many people strongly believe that It Is the responslblllty of Individuals rather than corporations and governments to deal with this problem To what extent do you agree 78
- In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why? 80
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sufficient money'.
Suggestion: sufficient money
...dical and scientific researches. Should a sufficient money is spent on those crucial areas, techno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49854227405 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10418556252 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1731596497 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.076923077 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198546670046 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661115472489 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845749396639 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129938026752 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839006318314 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.