Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.

It is clear that international assistance has been gaining a great deal of media attention in recent decades due to its substantial impacts on the developing nations. Although the proposal of financial help sounds reasonable, I think practical aids and advices would paymore dividends.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why multinational organisations would provide money for developing nations. First, pecuniary aids from outside organizations be conductive to the upgrade of transportation networks and the construction of more buildings for the homeless.This would remarkably mitigate traffic congestion and provide more shelters for the homeless individuals, improving the citizens’ living standards. Second, injection of funds from international government groups could lead to an increase in foreign companies and highly- industrialized parks in the funded nations. This could create more job opportunities for the local citizens especially young generations, culminating in the decrease in unemployment rates.
On the other hand, many practical and effective aids should be needed for a sustainable development. The first reason is that operation reliefs from outside governments would act as an effective antidote to the problems of poverty and starvation in the long term. For example, many North Korean people in the poverty-stricken regions have been saved thanks to food and medicine supplied from the neighboring affluent country of China. In addition to commodity supports, international organizations should establish more educational institutions and professional training courses in the developing nations. This would give those citizens more opportunity to experience a more progressive and standardised academic environment, promoting their career prospects with better social status.

In conclusion, i believe that an effective and realistic assistance would be a foundational element for the sustainability of both economy and society of the developing nations. The administrations in the developing nations should allocate the financial aids in an practical way to improve the citizens’ life quality.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-05-03 grahamoneil 84 view
2017-04-04 sandrock 84 view
Essays by user grahamoneil :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...tion of more buildings for the homeless.This would remarkably mitigate traffic conge...
^^^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...better social status. In conclusion, i believe that an effective and realistic...
^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an practical way" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ions should allocate the financial aids in an practical way to improve the citizens' life qual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 263, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s should allocate the financial aids in an practical way to improve the citizens&a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00977198697 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41711354866 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4625553191 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.923076923 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171572568541 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644651950605 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621093632734 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114516612733 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540338996729 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.