Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this.
Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, more people are concerned about the devastating consequences of environmental pollution. So, some argue to impose taxes on the production houses in order to deter the pollution while others believe in some other best alternative measures. In my opinion, instead of taxes, we should be more focused on the alternative ways to deal with this situation.
Admittedly, some people are so alarmed by observing the concurrent overwhelmed environmental pollution that they suggest that it’s the time to cope with this situation effectively by imposing the tax on the manufacturing companies. To illustrate, they argue that people are being tried to persuade by several means since long back enough so as to they become aware altering their behavior towards the environment but nobody cares and continually exploiting our surrounding by deforestation and bad emissions. So, it is clear that people would not act in a proper way unless they are being confronted by some financial burden such as tax.
On the other hand, others are still optimistically sorting out some other alternative ways to solve the issue. First of all, they suggest increasing our dependency on sustainable renewable energy sources instead of fossil fuels because it is one of the most detrimental causes of the environmental pollution. Secondly, tree plantation is another effective way not only for leveling off the impact of deforestation but also to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Finally, recycling household products seem to have appeared as one of the most effective ways to slash down the pollution as it would ultimately reduce the production of fresh items from the manufacturing plants.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinion, I think that, considering alternative steps than taxation would be much fruitful in terms of dealing with the current trend of environmental pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-31 | Jaspreet sidhu | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | Jaspreet sidhu | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | faruke | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it s not necessary to have internet access to live a full life What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 80
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Due to the use of computers and mobiles phones, letter-writing ability is disappearing. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communication and people use more and more social media to communicate and to follow news and events Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 94
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment Why is it still happening What are the solutions for this situation 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...by several means since long back enough so as to they become aware altering their behavi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., it is clear that people would not act in a proper way unless they are being confronted by som...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40939597315 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07231579818 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7400993692 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.545454545 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248547354004 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914060638047 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048530585459 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139032281357 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370738063475 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.