some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Despite different conditions in financial ability, government ought to support tuition fees for all university students to obtain their higher education. Some adversaries, however, believe that free university entry may create a heavy burden for the government in the long run while they still have to deal with many social and political difficulties.
On the one hand, it is widely perceived that tertiary qualified students with requiring standards could bring massive, wise and creative contribution to economics, healthcare and technology in order to boost the country development. Undoubtedly, graduated students with variety of agility and versatility in all fields have built global achievements so far. For example, efficient medicines created by university participants in recent years have cured distinct deathly diseases and saved many valuable human lives. Japan is also a plain proof when they consider education to be the key factor to develop their country. Furthermore, social equality could be enhanced greatly by free tuition payments for individual university attendants. Nowadays, most of societies appreciate equal statuses without discrimination for all stratums so free tertiary education will definitely prove fir this common acknowledgement.
On the other hand, regarding to current economic and political challenges, the government still faces to occurring problems, needing huge available funds. Unless the government significantly emphasized on tertiary education, insufficient funds would be run out in the future. Taking global poverty as an illustration could reveal that many inhabitants do not have enough food to survive. Therefore, poverty is probably prioritized by the government owing to its emergent and current circumstances. Moreover, free higher education can be a degradation in students’ motivation because failing or passing results will be considerably not a matter for them. All courses could be repeated without any extra costs. In addition, the concept of scholarship will be absolutely forgotten in no time when free costs are implemented without rewards for best performances.
In conclusion, it is rather impractical to allow free university education in terms of available sources of money and educational encouragement in spite of its beneficial effects.
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people think that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by proving computers and Intern 84
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people think that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by proving computers and Intern 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. ( approximately 150 words) 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the societies') or simply say ''most societies''.
Suggestion: most of the societies; most societies
...vidual university attendants. Nowadays, most of societies appreciate equal statuses without discr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85840707965 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18767018377 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2128146788 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239126684229 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713545937658 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462573381429 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141915570276 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730887384535 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.