Some people think that foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is believed that overseas tourists should be charged more than local residents for cultural sites and monuments. In my point of view, I disagree with this idea and I argue that foreigners ought to pay equally to local visitors for cultural and historical tourist attractions.
On the one hand, the reason why the price for foreign vistors should not be higher than for local residents is that it can make oversea tourists feel unhappy and they are not likely to revisit that place next time they come. In fact, if foreigners find out that the price are higher, they could find it unfair and unwelcome when coming to that country, As a result, this somewhat worsens their experience, which makes oversea visitors less likely to come to that country again. This not only
uglifies the image of the nation, it also cut diminish the amount of foreign visitors coming to the country. Therefore, setting higher price for foreigners could let them down and reduce the chance of they coming back.
On the other hand, setting a fixed price for both foreign visitors and local residents could help attract more overseas tourists. Fairness in price let foreigners feel more welcome and create good feeling about the nation. As a result, they are more likely to revisit the sites and recommend the country to their family and friends. Therefore, charging foreign tourists and local people the same price could help increase the number of overseas visitors coming to cultural and historical attractions.
In conclusion, foreigners should be charged the same as native residents for visiting cultural sites and monuments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome to that country again. This not only uglifies the image of the nation, it als...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07835820896 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41959990267 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473880597015 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9141599266 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30546912686 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137072523972 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850529978728 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190705521175 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983779521916 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.