Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible While others think that it should not start until 7 years of age discuss both views and give your opinion

This is a commonly held belief that children should start formal education from an early age. However, some assert that the proper age for serious training is about seven. Admittedly although I believe that children can start education as soon as possible, both sides of this view will be discussed in detail.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that learning formal education in childhood may disappointing them. The more children are forced to do an activity the more they disinterested. Take children who drop out the school just because they become exhausted from compulsory learning. To put it differently, kids need to have a happy time which can be created by playing with peers or toys more than study difficult courses. Fun times and entertainments play a crucial role in their healthy growth and deterrent from many deficiencies and mental disorders such as depression or tension.
On the other hand, the opposite view asserts that children should be trained formally as soon as possible. The most compelling argument is that kids have more ability to learn new things at a frantic pace. Simply put, they have more concentrate and energy which can be used in efficient ways such as learning. A good illustration is those who train to speak two or more languages in their childhood because their brain can process multitask properly without any bothering thoughts. Moreover, in this fast-changing world with a huge number of institutional facilities that simplify learning, children can enter the educational system earlier.
To sum up, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy, However, I believe that the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that children's education should be started earlier than 7 years old. This is mainly because of their ability and also training adequate tools.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'speaking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: speaking
... A good illustration is those who train to speak two or more languages in their childhoo...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13712374582 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78967458936 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5425594491 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20155019096 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727971455015 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908680812215 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148707355978 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111886357871 0.056905535591 197% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.