Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The idea that governmental financial assistance should be spent on stimulating art and culture remains a source of controversy. While this policy is believed to associate with a few shortcomings, I would contend that the benefits are far more significant.
There are two strong reasons as to why investing money in promoting cultural development is disadvantageous. Firstly, if the government allocate too much money to support cultural and artic activities, the comprehensive development of society is adversely affected. This is because when a large amount of money is used in the field of art and culture, authorities may have less money to allocate to other key fields, such as education, health care, the environment-related protection which are directly related to the improvement of human life. Secondly, people, especially students may pay more attention to the cultural program than other significant activities. They, as a consequence, can be distracted in learning academic knowledge such as cutting-edge technology, working skills, including communication, time management, leadership skills which are all need in the context of globalization.
However, I firmly claim that providing financial support for art and culture has more advantages. The primary reason is that if the governmental revenue is used to enhance art constructions and service facilities, the tourism industry may be encouraged. Not only can local people get job opportunities, but the government may be also paid more taxes by travel companies. In addition, although the merits of using governmental funding for culture do not reflect immediately, it has a profound impact on the preservation of national culture. Museum of ethnic Vietnam, for instance, is a place where has reserved the culture and house style of the 54 officially recognized ethnic groups in Vietnam thanks to the governmental budget for construction of the museum was millions USD.
In conclusion, although the investment funding in art and culture is disadvantageous in some ways, such as leading the imbalanced improvement in the community, I strongly argue that the pros of governmental financial support are greater, including promoting tourism and reservation national culture.
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal quanlities when they look for new employees?Why is in this case? Is it positive or negative? 84
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 73
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people thinks that printed books are no longer necsessary in this digital era as all writings can be stored electrically. Others think that printed books still play importance roles. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59117647059 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37614647963 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3795473149 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.230769231 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284169781064 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930724029823 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504464285924 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154783730584 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649757711347 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.