In the present day, there are many available subjects for children at school, which gives them the fundamental knowledge and skills of all parts of the world for living. Each student has their own outbreaking gifts, thus when they experience a variety of subjects, their gifts can be revealed leading to more improvement in that part. However, A group of pupils believes that investment from the government in teaching science is more efficient than the others to improve countries. From my perspective, I do not approve of that mention due to all the subjects have their own meaning and the lack of it is not adequate, which is illustrated by this essay.
Initially, There were two main groups of subjects in school science and social departments, and children were separated into them by their gifts. While the former children aimed to learn about the lesson around nature, which requires logical thinking and calculated skills, the latter students researched about society and how to communicate. However, children still search for knowledge about their opposite department due to the essential role of it in real life. For example, the person, who acquires many achievement in life, do not know how to communicate with people and make the surrounding relationship worse. As a result, life can not be happiness.
Moreover, investing only in science causes a bad society. The government's focus too much on science can develop the economy and technology in that country, but the morality can be secure. If people do not learn any lesson about society, they will not know how to participate in and distinguish true or false. When they invent equipment without moral standards, it can harm residents by its devil's purpose leading to the establishment of a negative society and restriction of country development.
In a nutshell, Each of the subjects has only one purpose teaching children about a part of the world and each student is suitable for different subjects; therefore, the government should not prior one subject. Staying equal between all subjects is the most sufficient choice.
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun achievement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many achievements'.
Suggestion: many achievements
.... For example, the person, who acquires many achievement in life, do not know how to communicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12865497076 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78394513868 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0937425295 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202928857818 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634890283699 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512268515493 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118408046053 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228220825108 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun achievement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many achievements'.
Suggestion: many achievements
.... For example, the person, who acquires many achievement in life, do not know how to communicate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12865497076 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78394513868 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0937425295 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202928857818 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634890283699 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512268515493 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118408046053 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228220825108 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.