Some people think that the government should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think that money should be spent on other priorities (such as environment).
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today, almost every country often spend a huge sum of money for various growth and development. It is argued by some that the authority should Spend their budget on improving the quick mode of public transport, whilst others feel that the money should go to other developments like environmental issues. This essay will be discussed both points of view.
On the one hand, some people feel that one of the best basic needs of society is that maintain a fair government transport system. So the government should utilize the greater allocation of the fund on it.This is because, without a better transport system in a nation, it affects society in many ways such as, diminish tourism, impact on the economy and so on. Quality transport brings many benefits like convenient and comfort travelling for public, whereas private car are not affordable for general people and more expensive too. For example, in Karnataka, India, where the state government has already implemented numerous brand new buses for both economic growth and better facility.
Opponents, one the other hand, opine that rather than spending on transport system, use that money for other areas. They think that the environment should be protected as it provides oxygen and other benefits. Therefore, the government should focus on this particular development than making roads and transport system in order to maintain a fair and beautiful ecosystem. For instance, in India, the local authority has already started to plant trees in public places like parks, schools and so on.
To conclude, although public transport is necessary for everyone, I believe that the government should allocate more money for balancing the earth. Unless protecting it, the consequences will be harmful across the globe.
- Nowadays young people are spending most of their leisure time using smartphone and tablets for amusement Is it a positive or a negative development Give your opinion 64
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 56
- In many countries, plastic bags are one of the main sources of damage to the environment, and so they should be banned.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Most people prefer ready to eat ready meals rather than home made for these days.What are the advantages and disadvantages? 67
- In some countries, old people are highly valued and in some countries, the young are considered to be more valuable.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ze the greater allocation of the fund on it.This is because, without a better tra...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...e greater allocation of the fund on it.This is because, without a better transport ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Quality transport brings many benefits like convenient and comfort travelling f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28169014085 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63022983903 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6389329926 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341776438165 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119581441039 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860173264488 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217491319763 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831695034667 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.