Whether arts are worthy of being invested in by governments or not has been questioned by some as the expenditure on various art types skyrockets every passing year. This essay will offer my viewpoint on this matter as to why governments should emphasize developing arts.
Arts are catharses for humans, which help them share their feelings with fellow homo sapiens regardless of their living era. Take paintings or doodles carved on stones that date back to thousands of years ago, for instance, people today can still relate to their authors by interpreting the artworks they leave behind, irrespective of the generation gap. Or how a student in Vietnam in the 21st century can grasp how bereft a French person felt during the French Revolution. Acknowledging this effect, governments spend heavily on arts to pay homage to different cultural values.
Understanding arts underpins open-mindedness as humans can hardly empathize with the feelings they have never had. By studying expressive materials, they can understand others’ viewpoints more throughout, which also applies to abstract paintings or in-comprehensive paragraphs. Sympathy enables humanity to tighten their bonds with others and inaugurates a golden age for human understandings as all feelings are considered equally valid.
All in all, the arts are worth investing as they advocate mutual understandings between humans of distinctive cultures, generations, guaranteeing a future of globalization.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64573991031 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15839627522 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.690582959641 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5851034321 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138333206603 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568339274177 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532846924308 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845804291455 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682663419569 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.