There is an increasing concern over the individual’s lifestyle should be changed by governments or being controlled by themselves. Both views will be discussed before my conclusion.
It is undoubtedly that an individual should be responsible for their own ways to live. This helps them feel freedom and get rid of anxiety about being controlled. For example, some people prefer playing sports to increase their body strength, while others maintain weight by engaging themselves in a healthy diet. Even though these kinds of activities may have some negative effects such as being injured or becoming too skinny, but it still their decisions and they should be responsible for this instead of the authorities. Moreover, it seems unrealistic if governments must be involved in each person lifestyle. For instance, a sedentary lifestyle of children should be the responsibility of parents and families. The governments can not make any significant improvement if the parents who struggle with work-life balance do not discourage their kids from eating junk foods.
On the other hand, governments play an important role in changing inhabitants’ unhealthy lifestyle which pose a threat to communities. In fact, low awareness people often satisfy their own choice of living while ignoring others. For instance, smoking has more negative effects on other innocent people than smokers, while alcoholic as well as being addicted to drugs affect adversely to entire populations. Therefore, governments should be involved in mitigating these problems. Publishing more stringent policies such as a heavier fine for a drug dealer or those who smoke in public areas may help.
In conclusion, while choosing the way one lives should be a personal decision, governments should be responsible for those who cause negative effects on the communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08630350316 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4007006952 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25998322276 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936525857446 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683624450741 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183675714869 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321053200056 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.