Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Today world is different compared to the past. Therefore, there is increasing concern over the time which is allocated to learn from the past is valuable. In my opinion, learning from the past help an individual gain invaluable experiences to avoid mistakes in the future.

To begin with, history is a compulsory subject in school curriculum. Therefore, most children are taught to know how things have gone in the past mostly via a history lesson. However, due to the wrong methodology in teaching history, the vast majority of students can not fully concentrate. For instance, instead of an appealing illustration, teachers force their students to remember the date and years in which an event occurred. As a result, students become bored and inclining to other subjects which play a crucial role in the development of their future careers such as science, English and computers.

On the other hand, learning from the past help us gain an invaluable experience. First, the advancement of technology today is an amazing result from numerous experiments from the last century. For instance, the father of electricity Michael Faraday conducted a huge number of experiments during his life and electricity, which is the very first environmental energy, is the most popular one. Moreover, the two World War happened in twenty centuries taught us what the war expense. As a result, an individual gain more tolerance and respect others to solve problems instead of keeping their arguments.

In conclusion, lessons from the past teach us many invaluable experiences which play an important role in our behaviour today. Therefore, I personally believe that the government and schools should work together to find out the way to engage youngsters in learning history since they are the next generations of our country.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88195868634 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2435267888 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156967216272 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581665692613 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427589315207 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102066335701 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268989061 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.