Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Arts like painting, music and sculpture are important elements of the cultural life of a country. Art enthusiasts argue that government patronage must be extended generously to those who contribute in this field, while critics believe that fund and help can be sought elsewhere. This essay, however, discusses both propositions and arrives at an opinion.
Art lovers and artists themselves say that the government has the responsibility to encourage artists through adequate funding, because creation of art works is costlier than ever before. Keeping the artistic traditions alive is part of the agenda for many nations today. It is argued that even the ancient kings and emperors took time and found money to patronize the artists of their time. The Mughal emperors, for instance, employed court poets, historians and musicians to entertain members of the palace as well as the royal guests. Therefore, governments must bear the cost of keeping arts alive.
On the other hand, spokespersons of private participation believe that art can be patronized by wealthy individuals or organisations. This tradition had been in vogue in many nations sometime in the past. In this situation governments can concentrate more on the much needed infrastructure development and welfare schemes. The wealthy lords and ladies of the medieval age, for example, housed and hosted many a brilliant artist, because of their unquestioned interest in art, an act which produced classics and renowned pieces of art. Thus, art can be encouraged by rich persons.
In conclusion, the government must do everything possible including funding to encourage art and artists, although private individuals can complement the efforts the authorities in this regard. No art must suffer from stagnation or retardation for want of money.
- In many countries more and more young people are becoming jobless What problems do you think unemployment will cause to individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 56
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women of different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000 56
- Is it wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young individuals who have less experience? 67
- Some people warn that the era of the silver screen is coming to an end and that people will eventually lose interest in going to the cinema.Do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropositions and arrives at an opinion. Art lovers and artists themselves say th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e funding, because creation of art works is costlier than ever before. Keeping th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t bear the cost of keeping arts alive. On the other hand, spokespersons of priv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e much needed infrastructure development and welfare schemes. The wealthy lords a...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...art can be encouraged by rich persons. In conclusion, the government must do ev...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40780141844 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95886023337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0655996476 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117633266328 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405221567458 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327219964655 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738660181442 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295272213614 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.