Some people think healthcare should be made free for all people, while others believe people should pay for healthcare by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Access to healthcare is among the primary concerns of every citizen around the world. However, it is usually restricted by people's capacity to pay for the treatments. For me, this is a deeply unfair reality that must be changed as soon as humanly possible. In the next few paragraphs, I will explain the reasons to arrive at such a position on this issue.
First of all, healthcare is a human right. So it is stated in the Declaration of Human Rights signed by the United Nations Organization in 2948. Therefore, countries are obligated to guarantee access to healthcare to everyone in their territories. No matter if they are locals, immigrants or tourists visiting the country. And many countries are already providing these services through well funded public systems.
Having a large and centralized public healthcare system is cheaper than its alternatives. Experts have proof that single payer systems have larger negotiating capacity with their suppliers and, therefore, have access to better prices. Whereas, decentralized systems where people go to different places based on their capability to pay for their treatment have to negotiate with their suppliers alone. Being unable to achieve the prices that a centralized system can get from vendors.
Finally, it is true that it is impossible to prevent wealthy people from travelling to other countries to achieve better or cheaper medical treatment. There are whole books written about the practice of medical tourism and how people with the means to do so, travel abroad for healthcare.
To sum up, healthcare is a basic human right recognized by the United Nations. This means every individual must have access to it, without concern for the size of its wallet. One way to achieve this is through the governments to provide public healthcare to their citizens. These systems have been shown to have lower costs than decentralized systems and are fairer for everybody. Finally, there are complications to achieve equal access to healthcare for everyone. However, these difficulties do not free us from our responsibilities to work towards it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | jiboncom | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | jiboncom | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-01 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-01 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-01 | utkarshshahi | 56 | view |
- some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. why do people like them? suggest at least one solution to discourage this. 73
- Internet Users as percentage of population 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 11
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factor such as music, friends have a great influence on children. Discuss both this views and give your opinions 56
- music brings people of different cultures and ages together. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces through well funded public systems. Having a large and centralized public he...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur responsibilities to work towards it.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, first of all, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8505223209 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8404915639 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5714285714 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180233668787 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057870433781 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481426742815 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103564892509 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031694820002 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.