Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
The question of whether organsing international sports events is beneficial for the nation has been a heated debate to many of its residents. There are contrasting perceptions for this, which I will discuss in this essay.
According to those who support the fact that their countries should host major sporting events, this provides a vast number of advantages to the nation. They deem that doing so spreads the profile of their countries worldwide, leading to foreigners’ acknowledgement as well as the surge in the number of tourists visiting them. As a result, the local economy will enjoy short-term virtues, for money earned from tourism are injected to it. Besides, hosting such worldwide events constitutes a long-lasting investment to the nation’s infrastructure and transport to provide adequate services to the influx of visitors coming to attend those events. Hence, as long as there are not any events taking place, the citizens will be the ones enjoying the full legacy of such investment.
However, critics may oppose the idea by proposing several banes that organising international sporting events causes. To them, the authority is squandering a large amount of money on the construction of stadiums, which are only in use in particular occasions. They believe that the money, instead, can be spent on more vital aspects of the country such as health and education. Apart from that, since a large amount of money is poured into building stadiums, money to ensure the developments of other fields drops considerably; therefore, to maintain these rates, high taxes will be imposed. Consequently, this triggers negative publicity towards the country.
To sum up, even though hosting major sporting events provides a country with certain benefits, my perception still inclines towards the idea that the government should not waste their money on this non-essential thing and use it for something more important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods others argue that customers should avoid buying with a lot of packaging discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 78
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or plays and performances in theater Why Should young people be encouraged to attend more classical music plays and performances 80
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether organsing international sports events i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, hence, however, may, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35081967213 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91148648647 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5026908299 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122012790616 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043480075645 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358944152161 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831093784972 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290878619043 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.