Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country, while some think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
The argument whether hosting an international sports event is beneficial for a country has polarized the public. In this essay, I would attempt to shed light on both viewpoint and present my opinion.
To begin with, the proponents argue that such events need a great amount of money that should have been spent on social services such as healthcare or education. This, as a result, would put too much pressure on government budget in terms of spending on infrastructure and new facilities. These newly built amenities might not even be reused after the event, which is totally a waste. A further issue is that a lot of resources will be allocated for crucial support in every part of the event. For example, for 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo, there are about eighty thousand volunteers working tirelessly to ensure everything go as planned.
Having said that, one big plus from being the host country of an international sports event is that it is the chance to promote nation branding. It will contribute to enhance the position and prestige of the country in the international arena while attracting more tourists in case the event is successful organized. What is more, public awareness of the importance of sporting activities would be increased as well. Regarding facilities built for the event, government should come up with solutions to make use of them. Korea is a typical example of reusing these kinds of sport amenity. Either the stadiums or sport centres which are built for 1988 Olympic Games was refurbished for other purposes such as exhibition or sport museum.
Weighing both sides of the argument again, I am of the opinion that the benefits of hosting an international sport event outweighs the drawbacks. Although it would be somewhat costly, especially for developing countries, the long-term benefits are precious.
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages There is a growing trend that people who have to work abroad would take their family along with them While there are some signi 89
- Many people work from home using modern technology today Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employers Do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of four different species of fish between 1982 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 89
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, the long-term benefits are precious.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, well, while, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09240924092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78216451535 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6516239602 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24290865941 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827457970956 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746762019774 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167881280132 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615354916701 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.