some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country. while some people think that it is bad. discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that having international sports events held in countries can have advantages. While others think that it would have bad effects on these countries. Personally, I agree with the latter idea, as I think this activity could cause huge problems to the environment as well as the traffic congestion in these countries.
On the one hand, when a country was chosen to be a place for holding an international sports event, it could have several merits from this. Firstly, the economy, as well as the tourism of that nation, would improve significantly. This is because people who come directly to that country to watch the sports would buy a variety of products such as soft drinks, popcorn to watch the match, and especially they have to pay an amount of money in order to enter the stadium. In addition, foreigners would also spend this time traveling
in this country to relax and discover about the country. As the result, that country would gain lots of benefits from the consumption and the demand of the foreigners, also from local people.
On the other hand, along with those advantages, the country would have many other drawbacks from these international sports events. To begin with, it is clear that the environment of that country would have devastating effects from these activities. It is undeniable that when local and international sports fans during watching the sports match, they would throw trash and have their food unconsciously fall onto the floor. Hence, when the match is finished, the stadium would contain tons of garbages and leftovers leading to poor sanitation, also the exhaustion of labor workers. Moreover, the traffic congestion of these countries would be another problem attributable to a huge influx of visitors coming to watch the match.
In conclusion, even international sports events would be a good activity for a country to develop their economy and tourism, but I believe with the drawback having on the environment, as well as the traffic jams are more serious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-03 | dennynguyen30 | 56 | view |
- Many people have valued the role of local history to schoolchildren over that of world history In my opinion I disagree with those people as both of them are equally essential for young learners 56
- Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned only with our own communities and countries Agree or disagree 61
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... held in countries can have advantages. While others think that it would have bad eff...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers would also spend this time traveling in this country to relax and discover ab...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06865671642 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72459978238 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501492537313 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4191748733 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183153793881 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724904775822 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687139057195 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116815602195 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692420327293 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... held in countries can have advantages. While others think that it would have bad eff...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers would also spend this time traveling in this country to relax and discover ab...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06865671642 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72459978238 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501492537313 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4191748733 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183153793881 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724904775822 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687139057195 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116815602195 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692420327293 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.