Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that governments should use their funds to invest in the preservation of wildlife. Others, however, think that using these funds to help people is better. In my view, the protection of wild animals is extremely important and that countries need to allocate money to preserve their native animal species.
In fact, the conservation of the natural animal world could bring many benefits to human. First of all, about medicine, a great deal of wildlife has found ways to fight off bacteria and cancer cells. They can create novel molecules that chemists have never known, and so, studying and researching these properties of species can help scientists find new, effective treatments. In the body of many plants and animals also contain useful chemicals, serving the production of pharmaceuticals. For example, In American, more than a quarter of prescription contain substances found in plants and animals. In addition, wild animals species can bring economic value. For instance, according to the Texas National Park and Wildlife Management Board, bird watching is the fastest growing recreational outdoor activity, estimated to contribute about 400 million each year to the state's budget. Research by the US Department of Wildlife and Fisheries also reported that observing the natural environment earned 85 billion dollars for the United State in 2001.
There are about 10 to 15 million species living on the planet together with humans creating a giant ecosystem whereby each part can influence the others. Therefore, the disappearance of one species will cause a chain reaction affecting many other species. Especially for the species that play an important role in the ecosystem, their extinction can lead to unpredictable consequences such as the gray wolf which is thought to be one of the most important species in the world.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe that governments should spend their budget on the protection of wildlife because that not only reduce negative impacts on the environment caused by humans but also fetch many benefits through the development of the economy and the progression in medicine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 84
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
- How often do you change your car and What car do you buy 92
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 88
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...n plants and animals. In addition, wild animals species can bring economic value. For i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34210526316 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86477046522 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9274348558 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941652879254 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344809982847 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439336750954 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604487037885 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433869362932 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.