The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002.
The table shows changes in cinema attendance and frequency, while the line graph provides a breakdown of attendance according to four different age groups from 1994 to 2002.
Overall, the proportion of the population attending the cinema saw a slight rise throughout the given period, as opposed to a pronounced decline in the annual number of visits made by an average individual and across all age groups. It is readily apparent that people aged 14-24 were consistently the most frequent moviegoers.
Regarding the table, 67% of the Australian population went to watch movies in 1994. This figure then rose markedly to 72% in 1996 and stayed unchanged till 2002 except for a dip in 2000. An average Australian attended the cinema 10.7 times a year in 1994. This level of frequency peaked at 11.3 in 1996 before declining remarkably to just over 8 visits till the end of the timescale.
Concerning the line graph, people of all age brackets made fewer visits to the cinema. To the more specific, attendance for all age groups increased slightly to peaks in 1996 before a dip to their lowest points in 1998. Number started to recover till 2002 when people between 14 and 24 years old made about 10 visits on average, compared to 8 visits by the 25-34 and over fifties and only 6 by those aged 35-49.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | Tienanh99 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- Some people think movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries 2000 2012 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76548672566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56041802548 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208687073433 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825569604752 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815609546985 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139657458725 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859120383976 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.