Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the
protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human
population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
<p class="MsoNormal">Many people believe that spending large resources conserve
the wildlife creators is less important than invest in human communities.
Personally, I think that we should allocate our time and money to both wild
animals and our population to make our life more healthy.</p><p class="MsoNormal">The protection of wild animals, of course, is a priority. In
the term of natural life, the wildlife extinction results in ecological crisis
which affects the biodiversity of nature. The illegal poaching of elephant
ivory and rhino horns, for examples, will decrease the number of creators in
the near future. Therefore, protecting wild animals mean that preserving their
habitat. Example of this, rainforest and wetlands not only are crucial
accommodation for animals but also affect climate change. If human's
urbanization destroys these factors, they will insult the food production.
Worse than that, it definitely changes the atmosphere our environment which
impacts directly to global's healthy. </p><p class="MsoNormal">Therefore, human communities are also benefited by
conservation wildlife. Firstly, it will promote tourism from all over the world
to these areas. Tram Chim National Park in Dong Thap province, for examples,
always attract not only lots of tourist in Viet Nam but also the number of
backpackers foreign to experience the glamorous of local nature. Secondly,
tourism will grow dramatically and could create more jobs for natives. Quality
life of local people will, therefore, increase rapidly when they have new jobs
and the opportunities to make friend with tourist. </p><p class="MsoNormal">In conclusion, I strongly believe that our resources should
spend on human population and even wildlife creators.<o:p></o:p></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ildlife creators.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17829457364 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.55625389463 2.80592935109 162% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2237656575 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0677866653558 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221972387314 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320864595518 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0193634950103 0.151304729494 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373525421077 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.