Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Money should be spent on protecting the wild animals or development of human population is still a controversy. From my perspective, I believe that while human problems also need to be coped with, I agree that money should be better spent on wild animals conservation.
Firstly, it is undeniable that human beings is the main factor that put animals on the verge of extinction. People destroyed the forests for landing, agriculture and industrial materials. This, in turn, leads to the biologic imbalance and impairs animal’s habitats. Moreover, wild animals are also at risk of being hunted for industry and trading. For example koala which is an endangered animal because of their luxurious fur so a large number of koala hunted and killed illegally reaches to two millions each year.
Secondly, the existence of any wild animals on this Earth would have impacts on human beings. Each animal would play an very critical role in the food chain, that is the circle of life and so does human. The disappearance of any animal would cause negative impact on other. Consequently, people do not make effort in protecting animals, they would also lack a source of food in their life.
In conclusion, the existence of any kind of animal in this world is necessary and people should take the responsibility of protecting them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...at money should be better spent on wild animals conservation. Firstly, it is undeniab...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nimal because of their luxurious fur so a large number of koala hunted and killed illegally reach...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on human beings. Each animal would play an very critical role in the food chain, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76999959753 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3777147849 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0833333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31305375997 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115447560955 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971507085092 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187892462682 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108869839662 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.