In the contemporary era, due to globalization, nations not only exchange goods and services but also culture and tradition. Although many of us comprehend this to be beneficial, others, on the contrary, argue that it diminishes the states unique identification. My appeal is that it has a mostly positive influence on the country. This essay keenly examines both the perceptions and in furtherance, shores up my opinion.
Firstly, let us put a light on the advantages. Despite numerous geographical and traditional barriers nations collaborate for the fulfillment of their respective needs. This is undeniable as it plays a prominent role in the evolution of a state. Exporting excess goods enhances the economy and importing is always essential in coping up with enormous demand. This relation is not just economical but cultural too, as we embrace a variety of foreign trends and traditions eventually. For example, during emergencies like a fatal pandemic outbreak rich nations supply medical assistance to the poor ones helping them to overcome the grim situation. Thus, the states must complement each other for better growth.
Now, we hurtle towards the drawbacks. In contrast to the above discussion, some citizens perceive this as disruption of their long appreciated heritage and identity crisis. It is debated that the infiltration of external traditions contaminates their antique culture. Moreover, it also brings a sense of superiority for the nation contributing the most over the rest of them. For example, some countries exploit the natural resources of others in the name of the business. In this way, there exist some grim effects too.
Summarizing the issue, it can be estimated that this has both benefits and as well as negatives. In the end, the advantages overshadow the shortcomings. So, it can be declared that collaboration between different nations is advantageous to a large extent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33774834437 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10280979461 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5520491178 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141304400595 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365465662608 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316004791887 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790555534037 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295934056888 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.