Some people think that individuals and companies, rather than the government, should pay for cleaning pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the proliferation of alarming messages about green issues, the question of who should be held accountable to pay for cleaning pollution is a subject of debate. While some believe that either people and companies or the government should allocate resources for this matter, I personally think that this issue must be tackled collectively by all of them.
There are a number of reasons why organizations and individuals should be responsible for financing pollution cleanup. Firstly, because industries use a large amount of fossil fuels and release contaminated water into rivers, it is undoubtedly fair that they should pay for cleaning the environment. On an individual level, people, in order to meet their basic needs, tend to consume a variety of products and services which cause pollution in the process of manufacturing them. In addition to this, they drive cars on a daily basis, adding to the increase in CO2 levels. Therefore, they should both equally invest in projects aimed at cleaning pollution.
In my opinion, governments should also give money to have a cleaner environment. This is because, they collect taxes and if a portion of this goes for environmental purposes, everybody will live in tidy and clean communities. Moreover, even if companies and individuals cannot afford directing funds at environment, governments are powerful enough to do this as their budget consists of billions of dollars. I do concede that they have other important areas to allocate money for, but donating only a small proportion of government budget for having fresher air and cleaner cities is a negligible price to pay.
In conclusion, I believe that paying for cleaning pollution must be a joint initiative of the government as well as companies and people within it.
- Most people take interviews to select a person for a job What are other ways Which is the best way of selection 84
- Around the world more adults can work from home and more children can study from home as computer technologies become cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a positive or negative development for society 78
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to direct'.
Suggestion: to direct
...companies and individuals cannot afford directing funds at environment, governments are p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96667746805 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8372342139 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32142213932 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114235656904 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656303089448 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210399027434 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413734253288 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.