Some people think an international car free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution Others think there are more effective ways to do it Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do it?

Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

Worldwide no using cars days are believed to be a valuable way of declining air pollution. Meanwhile, there are still some other measures according to the others. From my perspective, I believe that both of the solutions are completely overview when combining together and it will be discussed below.
On the one hand, there are some reasons that people still believe using cars on some special day may improve the air quality. First of all, all of people aware of how emission from car engines affect seriously to the current environment, so, they agree that spend some days to limit people in the entire world using cars to reduce the air pollution. It is beneficial for the environment, in fact. Some governments spent a whole day organizing a car-free day but its scale was smaller. Instead of driving automobiles or using public transport, the citizens decided to use some vehicles like electric cars, bicycles or even some people went for a walk, the result was pretty excellent. Some air testing centers checked the air quality, and the test was better than normal.

On the other hand, not using cars day is not completely advantageous for the air. In fact, except car emission, air pollution also derives from many power plants, especially some plants using fossil fuel to operate and industrial factories, its emissions are equivalent with the gas from automobiles or even more dangerous. Some dwellers living around some plants or factories said that it is impossible to breathe the fresh air, they even have to prepare some non-poisonous masks for the emergency. Deforestation is also the main cause in declining air quality, some trees can purify the poisonous air. In some developed cities like Singapore, which is one of the cleanest cities in the world, people live with many trees surrounded.
In conclusion, air pollution is not only from emissions from external combustion engines of cars, but it also from many places like plants or factories and trees shortage. Global car-free day is not enough to enhance the environment, it needs some other measures to solve it permanently.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-11 unknownabc 73 view
Essays by user unknownabc :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, well, while, even so, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04297994269 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68872054162 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521489971347 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1423937978 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227373223825 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861910052488 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445660330892 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14474968666 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259508238183 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.