It is widely acknowledged that Environmental problems, especially air pollution, have been a topic of interest in recent years. While many individuals argue that car-free days are visible solutions to tackle it, I believe that there are various ways that are more effective.
On the one hand, the application of car-free days might be a contributor to mitigating the deterioration of air quality. Firstly, banning cars would massively improve air pollution through the reduction of a lot of harmful gases that are a primary culprit behind air contamination. Secondly, car-free days can force motorists to find alternative means of transportation to commute, which might become a habit. A person who cannot drive their own car to work once a week may consider working at home or utilizing public transport, In the long run, they may willing to abandon their private vehicles, as a result. This acts as a precursor to protecting air quality.
On the other hand, I would advocate that air-related problems can be addressed in numerous feasible ways that are more effective than banning cars. The government should divert funding to manufacturing environmentally friendly energy sources in order to supersede fuels causing carbon footprints. If the state can make green energy less expensive, all individuals will have a chance to use carbon-free vehicles, which can reduce significantly exhaust fumes from transport. Furthermore, the government should impose strict laws associated with industrial production, such as mining and textile fabrication, to decrease levels of air pollution.
In conclusion, although the car-free days policy may aid in the reduction of air pollution, I still believe that it might be not the best solution. Instead, the government can consider allocating resources to eco-friendly energy or enacting industrial-related legislation because of its benefits
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution however others think there are some other ways 84
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- Although families have powerful influence on children the influence that comes from outside the family plays a bigger part in children s development To what extent do agree or disagree 78
- People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50344827586 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21222397686 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8971643575 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190151073207 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656222252582 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525418098834 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108638568438 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227052347568 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50344827586 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21222397686 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8971643575 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190151073207 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656222252582 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525418098834 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108638568438 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227052347568 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.