It is common knowledge that most companies offer their management employees with higher remuneration than that of rank and file employees. A number of individuals see this set up as appropriate. On the other hand, I feel ambivalent with this arrangement.
First and foremost, upper managers do contribute a lot to the company to merit higher wages. They bring years of experience and decision making skills that entry level employees are less likely capable. Most managers are promoted on the basis of their tenure, so, they are well capable to carry out tasks of their subordinates in cases of understaffing. Aside from that, senior managers are quintessential of decision-making. They assess the company status and plan for action. Since they give out the instruction, it is also them who face the results or repercussions. In addition, most higher ranking employees are on call day and night that they lose hours of sleep and family time. Therefore, being in a higher position does increase the level of stress felt by that individual which some managers even claim that that salary they earn do not reciprocate the stress they receive.
On the contrary, senior managers are not often bombarded with hard labor jobs as these part of the process are assigned to the low-ranking workers of the organisation. They are the ones who become physically worked-out and at the same time mentally drained. Such as in the case if nurses as front-liners in the healthcare system. Some would even acquire nosocomial infections as a result of their exposure to contagious patients. With this in mind, such workers should deserve a higher compensation because of the hard labor and risks they take. Likewise, the operations team make the company's products and in turn their profit, whereas the managers only oversee that profit is made. Hence, rank and file employees also deserve to be highly compensated because of the contributions they take part of.
By and large, the income of the managers and the rest of the employees should be based on the level of labor they do for the company. Senior managers do bring wisdom to the table, however, it is the low-ranking employees that draw income to the company.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own experiences. 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 73
- In many cities, security measures, such as the use of video cameras in public places,are being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh t 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... results or repercussions. In addition, most higher ranking employees are on call day and n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loyees that draw income to the company.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, whereas, i feel, in addition, such as, as a result, by and large, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01089918256 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80026546673 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534059945504 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4100253943 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.95 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.35 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152051262322 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468903739964 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374615353922 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941839284384 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232659107856 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.