As society is divided into various groups as per the distinct mindset of different people. A part of society believe that the space of cities ought to be used for gardens. However, others think that it must be used for making residents. This essay will intend to analyse both the views along with my perspective.
On the one hand, there are umpteen benefits of making parks for people. The prominent is to control pollution. In other words, as pollution become a severe issue in these days so, this contamination can be controlled by to make gardens which have so many trees because plants filtered the environment as well as people inhale fresh air. That is why, public and government would restrain the environmental problems through making parks places. Moreover, in morning and evening people would go for walk and children can play over these places which will be beneficial for their health.
On the other hand, as rapid growth of population become an integral part. To explicate, government should first utilize these places to make adequate houses for people so that public who have not homes to live they do not have house what is the benefits of park? Because trees and plants are essential but proper living place has their priority to every human. Hence, it is quite clear that legitimate residence must be needed.
To conclude, although parks are secondary need of any person than appropriate living place but one could not be ignored that this have many other benefits as well.
so many trees because plants…
so many trees because plants filtered the environment as well as people inhale fresh air. That is why, public and government would restrain the environmental problems through making parks places. Moreover, in morning and evening people would go for walk and children can play over these places which will be beneficial for their health.
On the other hand, as rapid growth of population become an integral part. To explicate, government should first utilize these places to make adequate houses for people so that public who have not homes to live they do not have house what is the benefits of park? Because trees and plants are essential but proper living place has their priority to every human. Hence, it is quite clear that legitimate residence must be needed.
To conclude, although parks are secondary need of any person than appropriate living place but one could not be ignored that this have many other benefits as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of different people. A part of society believe that the space of cities ought t...
^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent as well as people inhale fresh air. That is why, public and government would...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for their health. On the other hand, as rapid growth of population become an ...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... become an integral part. To explicate, government should first utilize these pl...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'housed'.
Suggestion: housed
...have not homes to live they do not have house what is the benefits of park? Because t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9094488189 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42052994568 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8331310012 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0714285714 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746984131987 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227992203781 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292095897524 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0458038134477 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286519654343 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.