In the contemporary society, it is believed that the governments should spend money on roads and motorways rather than on public transport systems. From my point of view, I partly agree with this statement followed with some explanations.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why the governments should spend money on improving traffic infrastructure. First of all, one of the major benefits of advanced roadways is to improve the level of road safety. For instance, if the roads are wide and smooth, regularly maintained, this will decrease road accidents and injury rates. Additionally, better roadway quality could not only ease traffic congestion but also rise travel efficiency of drivers. There will be more space for a large number of vehicles and shorten the total travel time during rush-hour traffic.
On the other hand, allocating financial resources also plays a vital role. Initially, compared to private vehicles, public transportation contributes a lot to saving the environment with less damage in the city, which results in a sharp decline of emission into the atmosphere and could make a huge difference to save our planet in the long run. Furthermore, it would fulfill the demand of those who do not have a private vehicle, such as motorbike or car if they have to travel every day, Buses, trains and underground are a suitable solution to their everyday travel.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that both investing in traffic infrastructure and on public transport systems are all advantageous in their own ways. I honestly hope that the governments can choose compatible way, depending on their situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f drivers. There will be more space for a large number of vehicles and shorten the total travel t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, honestly, if, so, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2808988764 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96302737145 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659176029963 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7231948442 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185912154932 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592980032537 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074140682861 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110952710473 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812604558894 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.