The provided table illustrate the proportion of club member and general public giving opinion about three different sectors for the new theatre in a town in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen obviously from the table that the majority of people were inclined toward excellent opinions whereas poor news accounted for a minority.
A quick glance at the table reveals that the rate of club members who thought facilities was excellent was 72%, nearly 50% higher than that of satisfied while poor opinions solely comprised a small fraction. Additionally, 54% of club members ranked information as excellent while nearly a third was for satisfied views and poor view accounted for 16%. Moreover, there was 88% of club members ranking quality as excellent, making up the highest point of excellent views among three fields. Eventually, the percentage of club members who thought it was satisfied and poor was 10% and 21%, respectively.
Turning to the other set of data, regarding facilities, general public who thought it was excellent was nearly two third whereas the others views comprised 24% for satisfied and 8% for poor. In addition, in terms of information, there was approximately 66% of general public ranking it as excellent and that of satisfied and poor was 20% and 14%, respectively. On top of that, more than a half of general public who thought it was excellent, much higher than that of satisfied, about 40% and the figure for poor opinions merely made up less than a tenth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...trate the proportion of club member and general public giving opinion about three different se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ther set of data, regarding facilities, general public who thought it was excellent was nearly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rmation, there was approximately 66% of general public ranking it as excellent and that of sat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ly. On top of that, more than a half of general public who thought it was excellent, much high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, as for, in addition, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01612903226 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69238916527 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495967741935 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7561050952 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172547153304 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091365037809 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519634083369 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12885522698 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626405352835 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.