Over the past few decades, social members have sparked off a heated controversy over the influences brought about by hosting sporting occasions. Personally, I believe that it exerts a double-edged impact upon the country and will support my view with specific reasons and examples.
On the one hand, many citizens conclude that organizing sporting events is not economically appropriate. Indeed, the disability to fulfill the event’s requirement of infrastructure make a substantial investment imperative for host nations to ensure the sufficient availability of traffic and sporting venues. However, the less developing a country is, the more enormous investment it needs. While many priorities like environmental pollution or poor living standard become heated, it may be deemed as an unnecessary financial burden, or even a budget extravagance. Additionally, the short-term use of monuments, making them redundant after the tournament, can exacerbate the problem due to an inadequate outcome. That was why Brazil authority faced a barrage of criticism when it hosted the 2014 FIFA world cup.
On the other hand, there are several reasons that people supporting these events can point out. First, they can create enthusiasm and excitement, motivating nationwide interests in playing sport and promoting health. Furthermore, organizing an event, a country is more likely to assure a persistent increase in recognition and global figure, as we see in the 2010 FIFA world cup, when the impression of prosperous and “post-apartheid” South Africa went viral. Another advantage can be reaped by the ability to easing political tension. For example, PyeongChang 2018 Olympic winter Games was a diplomatic breakthrough, assisting a firm basis for nation conciliation and denuclearization in Korean Peninsula.
Briefly, it seems to me that besides economic challenges, hosting sporting events still remains able to create positive impacts on the country, since the advantages can outweigh the disadvantages.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antages can outweigh the disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75666666667 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38514893813 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696666666667 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3249136986 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255842608414 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735775364827 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456454804313 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140527618605 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332037007169 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.