Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country.
Over the past few decades, social members have sparked off a heated controversy over the influences brought about by hosting sporting occasions. Personally, I believe that it exerts a double-edged impact upon the country and will support my view with specific reasons and examples.
On the one hand, many citizens conclude that organizing sporting events is not an appropriate decision in terms of economic. Indeed, the disability to fulfill the event’s requirement of infrastructure make a substantial investment imperative for host nation to ensure the sufficient availability of traffic and sporting venues. However, the lower level of development a country has, the more enormous investment it needs. Thus, while many priorities like environmental pollution or poor living standard become heated, it may be deemed as an unnecessary financial burden, or even a budget extravagance. Additionally, the short-term use of monuments, making them redundant after the tournament, can exacerbate the problem, an inadequate outcome. That was why Brazil authority faced a barrage of criticism when it hosted the 2014 FIFA world cup.
On the other hand, there are several reasons that people supporting these events can point out. First, they can create enthusiasm and excitement, motivating nationwide interests in playing sport and promoting health. Furthermore, organizing an event, a country is more likely to assure a persistent increase in recognition and global figure, as we see in the 2010 FIFA world cup, when the impression of prosperous and “post-apartheid” South Africa went viral. Another advantage can be reaped thanks to the ability to easing political tension. For example, PyeongChang 2018 Olympic winter Games was considered as a diplomatic breakthrough, assisting a firm basis for nation conciliation and denuclearization in Korean Peninsula.
In brief, it seems to me that besides economic challenges, hosting sporting events still remains able to create positive impacts on the country, since the advantages can outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-23 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes. However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 89
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antages can outweigh the disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70967741935 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35199010576 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687096774194 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6866280934 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251055224268 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720934405281 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453180847757 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138009095031 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313100980748 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.