Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views.

Essay topics:

Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop a social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views.

In recent decades, building friendship has come to the fore due to its substantial impacts on individuals’ life quality. Although some people advocate close rapport in workplace, others think social life without workmates will pay dividends.

On the one hand, There are a multitude of advantages when it comes to making friends with colleagues. First, Having best friends in workplace is invariably associated with an increase in their support and reverence. This acts acts as an incentive as a higher degree of commitments, dedication and self-confidence, which will improve the working outcomes. Second, good camaraderie with other co-workers contribute to the acquisition of working experience especially with the newcomers. For example, some new assembly-line workers could know how manufacture the products immediately thanks to the instruction of other colleagues.

On the other hand, a social life without workmates could offer some positive repercussions. First, diversed social life could culminate in a great deal of support from different social aspects. For instance, Making friends with doctors means a better advanced treatment than other patients and possibly an reduction in hospital expenses. In addition, A social bond without colleagues actually contribute to your opportunities of promising career prospects with bigger promotion. In fact, some individuals could utilise office politics like winning the brownie points with the managers and mislead her or him to undermine your competence.

In conclusion, It is apparent that a social bond with or without workmates could result in some desirable benefits in terms of career prospects and mutual support. Individuals are highly recommended to establish a relationship with people with positive personalities and affable attitudes.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-05-20 grahamoneil 61 view
2017-05-20 grahamoneil 61 view
Essays by user grahamoneil :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: acts
...se in their support and reverence. This acts acts as an incentive as a higher degree of c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntive as a higher degree of commitments, dedication and self-confidence, which wi...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...atment than other patients and possibly an reduction in hospital expenses. In addi...
^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r him to undermine your competence. In conclusion, It is apparent that a socia...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended establishing'.
Suggestion: recommended establishing
... mutual support. Individuals are highly recommended to establish a relationship with people with positiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80524344569 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15260156124 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.6081022307 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323461718565 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107491677793 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676468112477 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194954330771 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413539177345 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.