While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this?
The fact that developed nations’ rankings have fallen while developing ones’ have risen in the national happiness index in recent decades has been capturing significant public attention. Identifying the reasons behind this pattern could be the key to learning lessons for future improvements.
The main reason individuals in wealthy nations are less happy while those in poorer ones are not relates to how people live. It has been proven that at the backdrop of economic advancements in developing countries, more and more citizens embrace a lifestyle of collectivism, emphasizing social interaction and active engagement among members in neighborhoods. If people partake in joint activities and communicate with friends around, stressors and boredom could be reduced and happiness would be boosted. By contrast, wealthy nations dignify individualism where more people than before especially young generations choose secluded lives with insular hobbies followed by unfrequent interactions with friends or relatives. Consequently, these individuals would be susceptible to serious mental health issues stemming from loneliness including depression and social anxiety, harming their sense of happiness in the long run.
There are an important for both citizens and governments in developed nations to take notes that collectivism lifestyle should be popularized. In order to do so, official authorities should undertake initiatives where social events and meetings in neighborhoods will be organized on a frequent basis to attract residents. Such organizations create opportunities for dwellers to meet and communicate with each other, thereby reducing the lifestyle of seclusion. For example, in many Nordic nations, city councils started to host small gatherings allowing people to share their personal problems with both fellow participants and psychology experts, making them feel less lonely, more mutually understood and satisfied in lives, which are the keys to happiness.
In conclusion, lower levels of happiness are due to modern ways of living. Wealthy nations should learn poorer nations’ lifestyle of communicating with more people around by organizing more social events.
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be givenmore privacy, or is the price of their fame an invastion into their privatelife? 78
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments in developed nations to take notes that collectivism lifestyle should be po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89968652038 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03447628176 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648902821317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6666609661 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.769230769 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19745556686 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691462887505 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435051939204 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117242015098 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493561664784 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.