Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The sustainability of the library is one of the most significant discussion issues these days. Some people argue that it is unnecessary to maintain people’s profit and should find other digital storage media to replace. I completely disagree with this opinion and would suggest both opinion and the reason why.
It is mainly considered that the library is a kind of old heritage that is not used anymore and especially a huge architecture to take up too much space which should have been used as a factory site to produce profits. And also another opinion to consider is that the library is not able to make profits in the short-term period for the local residents who want to get a job. As the maintenance budget for public libraries is also a burden to each council, it derives the money and human resources from the budget which could have used for job creation for young people.
However, there are other people insist that the profitability of the library itself. Firstly, it can be the best option to store knowledge and information rather than a computer or other digital technology. As the development of informative technology is so fast, a new type of digital device can only survive in two shakes of a lamb’s tail. For instance, the VHS-type recording device which had spread on the globe in the 20th century could not be used in normal houses anymore. Moreover, digitising data of books should require a huge amount of budget to the government and council and the data should also be replaced periodically in accordance with the development of recording technology. It could allow much waste of money and time to preserve data.
For those reasons I suggest above, I definitely disagree with the opinion that the existence of the library is a waste and the possibility of replacement by the computer as a recording device for data storage. Only sustaining the library is the easiest and efficient method to reduce the budget and hand down the old and wise knowledge to the future generation.
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What problems are caused by this issue? What can be done to solve this situation? 73
- In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve the problems. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87790697674 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76266810275 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520348837209 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1785584604 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225713811423 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778815618995 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520914313599 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136631414567 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047270446197 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.