There is a controversial idea heating a debate over the fact that the major perk of international cooperation is in the environmental protection or is in the business worldwide. From my point of view, the latter is more likely to enjoy fruitful results from this trend for the following reasons.
On the one hand, it cannot be deniable that the environment plays an indispensable role in our daily lives. For the most part, given all nations are inexorably connected financially and politically, wealthier countries may provide poorer countries with ecologically linked aid in order to slow down their unrestrained industrialization. Whatever the outcomes of these activities, collective global efforts have a significant influence on individual consciousness, prompting people to act ecologically responsibly. Furthermore, by exchanging creative ideas, international collaboration might enable scientists to start research seminars. These measures, for instance, will create additional clean energy such as wind and solar in order to address significant environmental issues.
On the other hand, globalization also improves world business to a large extent in terms of the economy. For one, international collaboration will allow various countries to leverage their own advantages in order to maximize their economic growth potential. Taking China as an example, the country's large population draws more labor-intensive businesses such as manufacturing, resulting in more employment possibilities. Additionally, enhanced international trade operations can provide individuals with greater access to high-quality foreign items, thus improving their living standards and sense of satisfaction. On account of that, the growing international collaboration will eventually help the global economy.
To sum up, I believe that whereas international collaboration may result in certain environmental efforts, it is the corporate sector that gains the most from the progress.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph illustrates population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- As parents they should be required to attend parenting courses every year to bring up their children well and give them a better environment for growth To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01773049645 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54740578769 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5926468953 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.538461538 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903323729446 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332483276281 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321703692043 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537588760114 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281176700886 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01773049645 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54740578769 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5926468953 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.538461538 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903323729446 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332483276281 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321703692043 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537588760114 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281176700886 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.