Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. However, it is no longer the main form of transport. What are the reasons? What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population?
These days, people do not use bicycles as a major vehicle anymore in spite of the positive impact on the environment than other means of transportation. In this essay, I will discuss the causes of this situation and the measures to promote the usage of bicycles.
There are a host of reasons concerning this issue. Obviously, biking is more inconvenient than any other vehicle due to the speed and the physical demand. When people are going somewhere including workplaces or vacations, they will consider cars, motorbikes, and airplanes but not bicycles because riding a bike is really a waste of their time especially for citizens who are lean towards being chill out before going anywhere. In addition, biking also makes people feel exhausted when they get to their workplaces or their educational institutions as bikes offer a lot of energy to ride. Because of that, they will not concentrate on their works or their studies. On top of that, the effect of geographic features also declines considerably the usage of bicycles. For some commuters, bicycles are definitely not an optional choice when the weather at the time is awfully terrible such as torrential rain or heat waves. Owing to this problem, people would rather ride a motorbike or drive a car than cycling. According to the USA survey, 90% of citizens have their own bikes but 70% do not prefer bikes to any other vehicles because of the inconvenience of bicycles in any situation in human daily life.
Although biking maybe make you feel a bit uncomfortable, it is actually a phenomenal way to work out and helps you to get lean. Due to its positive impact on humans, we should have some solutions to encourage people to cycle more and more. For one, the government should advise residents to raise awareness of the biking perks. When citizens realize the strengths of cycling, they might change their opinion about cycles because it is significant that everyone is want to keep them in a good shape. What is more, applying cyclist-friendly infrastructure is the first step in promoting cycling, and it is vital in helping people make the switch. One of the most essential things that can be done to provide cyclists a sense of safety when riding among fast-moving automobiles is to create bike lanes on motorways or create cycle pathways in public parks.
To sum up, a massive number of people are not big on bicycles because of the inconvenience of it, but they actually forget about cycles benefits on the environment. On account of this problem, we should have some suitable measures to motivate residents to bike more including propagating them to raise awareness of cycling and building more cyclist construction that is friendly for people in particular and environment in general.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...e the usage of bicycles. There are a host of reasons concerning this issue. Obvio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, really, so, as to, in addition, in general, in particular, such as, in spite of, to sum up, what is more, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 464.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96336206897 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80966960235 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515086206897 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7822876445 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.210526316 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127317343778 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404323390397 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367821712222 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839357096651 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212915163016 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.