These days, air pollution is becoming an alarming trend worldwide. While many people think international days without cars are an efficient solution to diminish that global issue, others argue that there are some alternatives to solve it. From my perspective, I agree that the international car-free days is a sufficient way to deal with air pollution. In this essay, I will discuss both of these opinions.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that promote vehicle-forbidden events can reduce air contamination greatly. The first reason is that car reliance causes pollution in the air and contributes to global warming through exhaust emissions. Toxic fumes released into the environment can be minimized if a car-free campaign is organized on a worldwide scale, even for a few days. Furthermore, if commuters are unable to go by automobile, they will utilize alternative modes of transportation such as carpools, buses, or subways, which motivates more people to prioritize environmentally friendly cars. This would, in the long term, create a positive commuting habit in the public eye for many years to come. This measure has been adopted in several countries, including the United Kingdom, and has proven its effectiveness as a holistic approach to curtail emissions in all fields.
On the other hand, a number of people consider that there are more feasible and sustainable measures to prevent us from air pollution. The construction of dedicated lanes for public transportation is one of them. During peak hours, these lanes ensure that public transportation is faster than private automobiles, perhaps encouraging a majority of commuters to abandon their personal vehicles in favor of mass transit. Another strategy is to impose a carbon tax across the board, including on transportation and industrial output. When the government levies a tax on carbon usage, it is sure that citizens will decrease their carbon footprints by taking more public transports which leads to the lowering of air pollution.
To sum up, whereas so many people say that other measures are more effective such as the establishment of devoted lanes or levy a carbon tax, I still believe that advertise an international car-free days campaign is a phenomenal solution to protect us from the air pollution problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, whereas, while, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3085399449 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11295984785 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584022038567 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9034269618 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4375 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258323170042 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733261468235 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080516729404 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170946526141 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128436560011 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.