It is often argued that preserving public athenaeums is becoming dispensable due to the growth of gadget technology. I vehemently disagree with this argument, and my rationale behind my viewpoint will be divulged in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, attending public athenaeums may fuel the development of a positive reading culture. This is because of the fact that books from communal libraries are always carefully categorized by library staff members before being displayed among readers. As a result, information from these books is likely to be more accurate and reliable than those from the internet. Mariana, for instance, was strictly penalized for having provided such discourteous content that made a lot of children have deviatory reflection. That is why it is more felicitous to choose physical reading rooms rather than virtual ones.
Secondly, public book rooms are likely to open up the avenue for those who do not have the conditions to utilize technology equipment. In fact, reading real books may benefit people in strengthening their mental health. For example, most elderly people these days are technophobes; therefore, public reading centers are their preferred option. In other words, perusing paper books undoubtedly makes great inroads in putting old people to be in full possession of their faculties. Thus, the advantages of communal libraries indubitably outweigh computer technology.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of artificial intelligence in bestowing information, in my opinion, there are good grounds for rejecting the view that spending money on maintaining unrestricted athenaeums is a waste of money.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Hazel mal
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivulged in the forthcoming paragraphs. Firstly, attending public athenaeums may...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... of a positive reading culture. This is because of the fact that books from communal libraries are alway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading rooms rather than virtual ones. Secondly, public book rooms are likely t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubitably outweigh computer technology. In conclusion, despite the benefits of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.612 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99515341844 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4875127138 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166103432382 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544436792701 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036849392505 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092728453075 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462778919823 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.