Some people think that modern technology is naking people less sociable, while others think it is making them less sociabke. Dicuss both views.
The notion about modern technology trigger a considerable debate. An opinion in this regard advocated by a cluster of like-minded people is that people are becoming more sociable because of present day technologies. Others, however take a dim view of it and observe that proliferation in technology have negative impact on people's social life. The upcoming paragraph will analyse these twain sides in advance of my personal viewpoint.
The proponents of former view assert that sports sponsorship by companies have benefits. In the first place, modern technology connect people globally. Mobile phones and internet revolutionised the way of communication. People can stay in touch with family, friends and colleagues, whenever they want. Besides applications like Facebook, Sanpchat, twitter, Instagram allow people to connect with people's all around the world. They can text, call, share pictures or videos, video messaging to each other.
Nevertheless, many individuals does not follow suit and reckons that technology have bad impacts on people's social life. Now days, individuals are busy in their virtual world life. Instead of interaction with family members or friends and leisure activities like playing outdoor games and reading books, they like to watch online video or playing digital games. However, online dating is another trend among youngsters, which effect their social life. Moreover, these days shopping on internet lessen the interaction among society.
At last, it can be summed up that no doubt both sides have convincing arguments, but i strongly deem that drawbacks modern technologies out weighted the advantages on social life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Sarwan1996 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, no doubt, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79194516385 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670634920635 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.534430627 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156829897291 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512864653753 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539504066061 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957342207676 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462871709293 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.