Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?（2018.12.01
It is true that human is going to suffer from a variety of problems in the near decades, such as a population explosion and an energy crisis. While I do believe there are so many unsolved problems in our society that require money, it is still justified and necessary to spend money on exploring the universe.
Granted, pouring money on other areas does bring more benefits. This is because money from the governments has addressed many existing problems on developing countries, such as a food shortage, inadequate energy supply and poor infrastructure. Nevertheless, these problems are also key obstacles to developments in underdeveloped regions, which means if there are more funds on such issues, the crime rate will reduce in those areas and people working there are motivated to work harder. Apparently, spending money in this way is more meaningful for mankind than in space explorations.
However, that is not to say we should stop investing money on space exploration. Our universe is rich in resources than we can ever imagine, and once our technology reach the level of gaining such resources, the problems that we faced in the future might be eradicated once and for all. For example, the US government has been progressing their technology in studying mysterious Mars, and NASA recently confirms evidence that liquid water flows on today’s Mars. This breaking news indicates that in the future mankind is able to live beyond the Earth to satisfy the increasing need of population. From the perspective of scientific research, huge breakthroughs in medicine and constructing will come in when our high-tech spacecrafts discover life or rare metal that do not exist on the Earth.
In conclusion, it seems to me that spending money on social issues is more significant, while we still have to share the cost of the technology for space exploration to seek help in tackling upcoming problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13099041534 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92323015269 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3356119305 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25435423064 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094983480144 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815161522572 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155761994324 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527225311423 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.