Some people think that mothers should spend most of their time raising family‚ and therefore the government should support them financially.Do you agree or disagree??
The lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades.Presently‚ women are stepping out of houses for work in order to manage astronomical outlays which influenced their families negatively. Hence‚ it is argued that mother should be at home to look after family and therefore served with financial assistance by administration. Here‚ i would like to discord with given statement.
There are numerous points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost‚ the contribution of working mothers to boost productivity at work places is highly commendable. Hence‚ monetary aids could deprive working sectors of female's exceptional talent. Moreover‚ governments of some thriving nations have to manage hefty sum of money to facilitate people with optimum transportation‚ education and employment opportunities. Thus‚ they may not have adequate fund to confer financial support to mothers.
Further emphasizing on my point of view‚ in male domineering society it is essential for females to rub shoulder with man in every walk of life to bring equality and to develop self esteem. Consequently‚ the idea of money endorsement seems to be useless. By contrast others have conflicting opinions.
They think that‚ children do not attain social etiquette and educational support due to busy lifestyle of parents. Besides this‚ they may join crime activities on account of less observation. In addition‚ family life is supposed to be worse in the absence of mother.For instance‚neither domestic chores can be managed properly nor children and grandparents could be taken care of. Thence‚ mothers must be supported with sufficient lucre so that they do not need to work for money.
To recapitulate‚ mother is backbone of every family union.Undeniably‚financial support ensure overall development of family. However‚ some other alyerantives can be searched rather than binding women with home responsibilities only
- Some people believe that sport competitions are a source of emotional stress for young people Therefore youth should be banned from participating in sport competitions Do you agree or disagree 60
- Some people think that mothers should spend most of their time raising family‚ and therefore the government should support them financially.Do you agree or disagree?? 73
- many countries spend too much money on training of a few individuals for international sports competition Some people believe that government should spend more in ordinary people instead Do you agree r disagree give your opinion and example 79
- Some people think that organizations would benefit more from young managers than from older ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- : Some people say that the government should invest in trains and the subway system to prevent traffic congestion in large cities. Others, however, think it should build wider roads. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Presently‚
...amatic changes over a couple of decades.Presently‚ women are stepping out of houses for wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ial assistance by administration. Here‚ i would like to discord with given statem...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...confer financial support to mothers. Further emphasizing on my point of view‚ in mal...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ed to be worse in the absence of mother.For instance‚neither domestic chores can be...
^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Undeniably‚financial
...other is backbone of every family union.Undeniably‚financial support ensure overall development of f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.297734627832 0.247107183377 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.200647249191 0.155533422707 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0970873786408 0.0946595960268 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0291262135922 0.0501214627716 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291262135922 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.148867313916 0.122226691241 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0517799352751 0.0403226058552 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.57598732583 2.80594681477 127% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0550161812298 0.0326793684256 168% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0291262135922 0.0861772015684 34% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0291262135922 0.021408717616 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00323624595469 0.011925033212 27% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1959.0 1933.35771543 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.68600682594 6.12580529183 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.440273037543 0.374742101984 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.358361774744 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242320819113 0.203846283523 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167235494881 0.137316102897 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57598732583 2.80594681477 127% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.037074148 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662116040956 0.56093040696 118% => OK
Word variations: 81.0587508037 60.7387585426 133% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4707939116 49.517814964 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.235294118 127.492653851 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.814263465372 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 53.071471592 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.925 1.69124875643 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184873196049 0.332605444948 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0408014972015 0.102741220458 40% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0340247219988 0.0668466124924 51% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494692440614 0.534860350844 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139237938847 0.148594505496 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661631168703 0.134430193775 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450729483664 0.0742795772207 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284557762695 0.324371583561 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0589255650688 0.0638462369009 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114381589684 0.228012699653 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029566043846 0.058150111329 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.