Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some opinions argue that people should design their houses with the same style as the old buildings, the other perspective claim that the we have the right to build houses in our own tastes. Although, I am more into the idea that the citizens should be albe to construct houses by their ideas, I am going to clarify both views.
On the one hand, it is true that old ancient houses have it own attractive. The tradition style show off the creativity of the previous generation through patterns on the wall, specialise construction or the mixture of painting color. These houses also give us history lesson such as how these houses were built and the story behind. Futhermore, keeping the old style until now will convey the characteristics of a whole local area. Take ancient street of Hanoi as an example, all the buildings which are built from hundred years ago is a tourist attraction place. The fact that if our generation can continue design our houses by this style, the aesthetic beauty will be maintained and more tourists will come and visit this amazing site.
Despite all the advantages the old ancient style houses can bring, from my point of view, I am still into modern buildings. Human creativity is boundless. If we are forced to construct our houses by a model shape from many years ago, humanity would not able to turn wonderful ideas become reality. Besides, as the world is developing and the population is also rising, the old style cannot respond the need of human kind. New fresh designed houses are the key to people convenient, comfortable and recline.
In conclusion, ancient houses can benefit us in some ways but the modern houses still are the need and want by many people. For me, I prefer the latter view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | nganphuong05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | paenziii | 67 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 61
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 80
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...dings, the other perspective claim that the we have the right to build houses in our o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...is true that old ancient houses have it own attractive. The tradition style show of...
^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... all the buildings which are built from hundred years ago is a tourist attraction place...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76644736842 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46103419681 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1640958678 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397481710099 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115408106071 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995572073881 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236770278507 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105924707908 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.