Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people believe that new houses should follow the style which is popular in the area. However, others contend that we should welcome unconventional architecture. I argue that it would be better if we build new houses on the base of modern designs.
On the one hand, although there are some advantages, the original houses have some disadvantages. From a positive perspective, traditional constructions actually provide a link to our roots. In other words, it is clear that if new buildings ceaselessly follow the original construction, this really helps tangible cultural heritage to exist continuously. However, the new houses which are built based on traditional materials such as natural stones or wood is probably unaffordable. Although stone quarries or wood are quite available, their cost actually is much more expensive than new construction materials.
On the other hand, I believe that it is beneficial if modern constructions become more popular. One reason is that the cost of building materials is more affordable than natural ones. Besides, not only much cheaper, but the materials revolution also has consistently introduced new products which are more durable and consequently less maintenance expenditure than the traditional counterparts. Furthermore, if individuals have the right to construct new houses follow their own styles, this is really a good chance to unleash creativity. Although they also tend to dismiss traditional idea and fail to blend in with surroundings, houses which are built on personal styles make their owner feel comfortable.
In conclusion, while the style of the old houses has some certain benefits, I believe that people should have the right to design their own houses on the basis of financial condition and creativity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | NamVu | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 81
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...Besides, not only much cheaper, but the materials revolution also has consistently introd...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, really, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43682310469 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07435432642 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9231040017 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304779008333 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108396298511 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10756865409 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22670801529 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104617786228 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.