Living in the post-digital era, people can keep abreast of up-to-date information with a click of a mouse or at the touch of an app. This prevailing trend has sparked a heated debate about which is the most effective way of getting people up to speed with what is happening in this world. Some claim newspapers are the key pathway to news whereas others think this can be done more effectively through other media. In order to delve deeply into this dilemma, this essay will discuss the pros and cons of the two opposing views and explain why traditional newspapers will be eventually superseded by the internet.
On the one hand, newspapers are thought of as the reliable sources to learn about news due to their authority and accuracy. Most world-famous newspaper companies employ well-experienced editors and journalists to write news articles, and their authoritative comments on different issues usually have a profound impact on society. In addition, each piece of news in newspapers is meticulously verified before being published. People involved in the checking process follow various steps to investigate the authenticity regarding the sources of news and relevant images. Given the credibility, a slight increase has occurred in people reading printed newspapers, and this phenomenon is ascribed to the fake news running rampant in social media. Over a quarter of the U.S. population is reported to have misled by online false information; nevertheless, newspapers strictly examined by conscientious editors are exempt from this accusation.
On the other hand, Internet-based media are considered a more effective alternative to access the latest news because of their availability and efficiency. With a click of a button, people are able to acquire a lot of breaking news anywhere and anytime. For instance, they can stream the World Cup Final from BBC online channels, Facebook and Twitter, and this is what newspapers can hardly compete against. Moreover, the information people obtain from newspapers is not necessarily the most updated version because journalists can neither add nor revise anything upon their publication. Nonetheless, online news websites and social media apps, as opposed to traditional newspapers, can update their news coverage, thereby assuring readers of the latest information.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that the Internet-based media are undoubtedly the most effective means of staying in touch with the world, as they not only inform the public of what is happening but also bridge the world without any delay.
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 89
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 84
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What causes of the increased demand and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to this pr 84
- Nowadays people the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, then, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30602409639 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97204666892 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556626506024 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6653227113 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322452309399 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104108202673 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838856930474 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177172473879 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597357138656 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.