Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the past decades, environmental pollution has become a serious problem and provoke debate about what are the best solutions. In my opinion, increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles is an eminent method for this issue.
First, enterprises produce goods base on customer’s demands and the demand of fossil fuels always increase gradually due to more and more individuals choose vehicles consuming fuels as their main transport. Vehicles using fuels are popular because of their convenient and affordable price which make customers straightforward to buy and consume. Thus, exorbitant cost of fuels will hesitate customer’s decision in using cars and other vehicles and create an urge of using other energy sources. This downward trend of fuels ‘s demand stimulate producers to find alternative energy sources which are environmentally friendly such as electrical or biological energy to replace fossil fuels.
Second, enacting and enforcing policies increasing price of fuels is an embodying of high conscious of governments about environmental degradation and effort to alleviate environmental problems. In particular, the introduction of policy increasing price of fuels is a result of a profound consideration of administrations to fight climate change and reserve human environment. And this policy is a starting point of following stimulation and intervention about reducing fossil energy consumption and developing alternative energy sources. For example, there are many parallel policies can be also introduced such as reducing taxes for companies producing green energy or vehicles using non-fuels.
In conclusion, the rise of cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles should be taken in serious consideration as an efficient solution for environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | vuhieuquy | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Khiem Duy | 74 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76119402985 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23140360497 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548507462687 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0311133426 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225526712116 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982409014636 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664150135318 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173235014453 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071818861933 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.